The classic experiment, Will You Ell For A Dollar, In the Griffin book, A First Look At Communication, was cited as an example or this type of strategy In lessening dissonance. This often Is used In persuasion, In telling people, or even animals In this case, to do something. This technique may not pertain only to the actual thing being commanded for one to do that Is lessened but also to the manner of how the persuasion Is done as bribery could be part also of the picture. In line with this, here is one specific conversation, one communication act from a 2010 movie, Alice in Wonderland.
Stance (Knave of Hearts): Find the scent of the human girl and your freedom. Barnyard the Bloodhound): For my wife and for my pups as well? Stance: Everyone will go home. Barnyard: *sets out for his search for Alice as he is freed from his neck chains by the guards of the Red Queen* Horse: Dogs will believe everything. Barnyard: *chuckling* Scrutinizing the conversation, we could infer that Barnyard is hesitant to do the search as his neck was tied to two long chains so as the guards could control him. Even if he was a slave, if he was willing to obey, then, there would have been no need to neck- chain or bribe him, would there be?
As a hypothesis, perhaps he was hesitant to obey the orders of the Bloody Red Queen, through Stance and her guards (made of cards), because he did not like the idea of capturing the innocent Alice, killing her so that she could not slay the Jawbreakers, which was the prized pet of the queen, as predicted by the oracle. Despite this possible thinking and hesitation of Barnyard the Bloodhound, he still chose to find the scent of Alice, provided of course that he was promised by Stance for his and his family freedom.
Emotional bribery – this was the tit of the Knave of Hearts for him. Furthermore, this communication act falling under the theory, cognitive dissonance, Is monotheistic because It provides quite a universal or general idea as It states that when less pressure Is conformed, less dissonance Is experienced. It Is Indeed monotheistic, moreover, for the reason that Its concept, the act, could be measured and operated for validly and reliability through the process of scrutiny and analysis to Implications In the conversation.
Article Review on Biotechnology By grammaticality people suffer from because of the inconsistencies of their actions and their beliefs. The individual reporting of this topic mentioned the strategy of using only less pressure to conform to cut back dissonance. The classic experiment, Will You Lie For A Dollar, in the Griffin book, A First Look At Communication, was cited as an example for this type of strategy in lessening dissonance. This often is used in persuasion, in telling people, or even animals in this case, to do something.
This technique may not retain only to the actual thing being commanded for one to do that is lessened but also to the manner of how the persuasion is done as bribery could be part also of the under the theory, cognitive dissonance, is monotheistic because it provides quite a universal or general idea as it states that when less pressure is conformed, less dissonance is experienced. It is indeed monotheistic, moreover, for the reason that its concept, the act, could be measured and operated for validity and reliability through the process of scrutiny and analysis of implications in the conversation.