The results Indicated Improvement in the scores, however the participant’s score never got below the clinical cutting score of 30. Meditative Breathing for the Treatment of Anxiety purpose of this paper is to present the findings from an experiment that examined the effectiveness of meditative breathing on the participant’s clinical level of anxiety. Monocotyledon and anxiety disorders are among the most common psychiatric disorders noted in the clinical setting.
About 5% of LLC_S_ adults experience generalized anxiety disorder at some point during their lifetime, and about 3% have it in any given year (Detonate & Unguent, 2007). Some ways anxiety manifests in persons who suffer from it are gastrointestinal symptoms, sleep disturbances, hangers in eating patterns, muscle aches and pains, increased irritability, shortness of breath, and difficulty concentrating (Zion et al. , 1992). Another common symptom of anxiety Is racing thoughts, which often stems from difficulty concentrating.
A person with a clinically high level of anxiety may not be able to malting focus on a present task due to his or her fleeting thoughts of future responsibilities needing attention. Studies have shown that there is a genetic component in persons who are diagnosed with anxiety disorders; however, research also strongly suggests that a person’s environment, particularly a consistently stressful one, can Influence his or her anxiety level In a negative way (Zion et al. , 1992).
With the increased frequency anxiety is being diagnosed, treatments for the disorder are also being researched and implemented among those experiencing anxiety. Some common forms of treatment for anxiety disorder include cognitive behavior therapy, exposure therapy, medication therapy, exercise, Journaling, stress-reduction techniques, hypnosis, and meditation (Ann.’s, 2005). Over the past several years, meditation has received increased attention from searchers focusing on alternatives to medication for persons with anxiety. Meditative Breathings the past 20 years, meditation has established a place health problems.
Meditation has been found to be effective with chronic pain, quality of life, stress reduction, and anxiety disorders (Murphy, 2006). Zion, et al. Noted in one study that meditation is effective in reducing anxiety symptoms, and maintain the reduction. The author further noted that due to the nature of the study it suggested strong generalization to nonsolid participants (1992). Meditation is similar to other anxiety reduction techniques in that it teaches people o relax, decrease intrusive thoughts and/or obsessive thinking, and enhance focus and performance.
The ultimate goal of meditation leads towards participants having a relaxed, focused state of mind that allows them to then interact with the world in an efficient and calm manner (Murphy, 2006). With the newfound calmness, the person can then refocus his or her energy on the present rather than what may or may not happen in the future and/or any obsessive thoughts they are having; thus meditation is often helpful in reducing racing and/or obsessive thoughts that interfere with the completion of present-moment tasks (Murphy, 2006).
The literature to substantiate continues to increase as researchers and patients alike seeks alternative to medication for treating anxiety. Meditation is especially useful in then clinical setting, and applicable to a wide participant base, due to the absence of spiritual/religious language and its compatibility with other interventions (Murphy, 2006). Meditation is also appropriate in treating anxiety since persistent symptoms of anxiety, and depression, often reflect deficiencies in coping that meditation techniques often have a positive effect on (Detonate & Unguent, 2007).
Meditative breathing is specific form of meditative that has been found effective in treating symptoms of anxiety (Voice, 2003). Meditative breathing is essentially taking a few minutes to stop and focus on the rising and falling on your breath. A person will do the activity for a specified time limit or number of breaths. The goal is for the person to clear his or her mind of all thoughts unrelated to their breathing. Through this process the person is said to be ‘centering’ themselves and disengaging from stressful distractions such as racing and/or obsessive thoughts (Murphy, 2006).
Meditative breathing is effective in treating anxiety for several reasons. First, meditative breathing reduced the person’s heart rate and therefore has a positive effect on the physiological symptoms of anxiety. Second, meditative breathing is convenient and practical in that it can be performed in any location and takes little time to complete. Third, initial results are immediate- producing an instant calm when performed. Lastly, it can be combined with other treatment modalities (Voice, 2003).
For these reasons, meditative breathing was chosen as the appropriate intervention treated to combat anxiety. Chosen was meditative breathing. The objective of the experiment was to significantly reduce the participant’s anxiety through the use of meditative breathing done three times a day. Meditative breathing was assigned three times a day in order to combat the three most stressful times of her day, in the morning before leaving for school, during her lunch hour, and before going to sleep.
The meditative breathing exercise included 5 minutes of deep breathing during which time the participant would 1) remove herself from distractions (phone, peers, television, radio, etc. , 2) sit in a comfortable position, 3) breath deeply in and out for a total of 5 minutes paying close attention to the rise and fall of her breath and focusing her thoughts on her breathing. During the periods of deep breathing the participant would try and block out intrusive and/or racing thoughts. This exercise was completed at approximately the same times each day based on the participant’s school and work schedule.
The construct of anxiety was measured by the Clinical Anxiety Scale (CASE). The CASE was an appropriate measure for this experiment since it measures specific events or tuitions that typically induce anxiety for the person (Nugent, Shippers, & Hudson, 2001). It is appropriate since the participant’s anxiety is intensified as social anxiety, specifically induced by the thought of being around large groups of people, particularly in the school setting. The CASE has produced scores with a . 90 or higher reliability, and is evidenced to have good content and construct validity.
The CASE consists of 25 questions and has a clinical cutting score of 30, indicating that a person with a score over 30 most often has a clinically significant problem with anxiety (Nugent et al. 2001). The CASE is also an effective measurement tool since it utilizes reverse questioning design used for the experiment was the basic single- system design, the ABA design. This designed was used since it was feasible to gather a baseline measurement, and then implement the treatment phase; however a baseline was not re-measured after the treatment phase.
The use of the ABA design was helpful in increasing the power of the single-system design and providing a compelling argument for the interventions effects on the target problem. The ABA design was also chosen in order to continue to provide a positive intervention o the participant. Studies with meditation indicate that the effects rarely wane after prolonged periods, and often times the effectiveness remains steady, if not increasing (Zion, et al. , 1992).
With this knowledge, it was decided to complete an ABA design, unless the meditation produced an adverse affect on the participant’s level of anxiety, in which case the intervention would be withdrawn. However, unless negative results were indicated by the participant’s score on the CASE, treatment would not be discontinued. The baseline was three weeks in length, measured two consecutive Fridays before Scale. The intervention phase lasted Monday-Friday for four weeks. The participant completed the meditative breathing exercise three times each day, Monday-Friday, for the four weeks.
In order to monitor the effect of the intervention on the participant’s anxiety, she completed the Clinical Anxiety Scale at approximately the same time each Friday throughout the intervention phase. The participant’s scores were calculated by a second-party who was not made aware of the meaning of the score, or the clinical cutting score. The participant did not read the scale between measurement times, nor did she see her scores until after implementing the scale for the final time. These steps were taken in order to decrease the threat to internal validity.
Results the end of the seven week experiment, the scores were put into a table (1 . 1) and then graphed (1. 2) in order to interpret the results. Table 1. 1 : Measurement of Anxiety (on CASE) During Meditative Breathing Intervention’s (l enterer enterer enterer intervention)Score on CAS36343433323131 Measurement of Anxiety (score on CASE) during Meditative Breathing InterventionBaselinelntervention While the scores do show a decrease ruing the intervention phase, the clinical significance is difficult to determine.
This is due to a few reasons. First, the scores declined before treatment was initiated, with a Jump from 36 to 34 before the participant began meditative breathing. Second, the scores never dipped below the clinical cutting score of 30, indicating that the participant was still at risk for significant anxiety symptoms at the end of the experiment. However, a good indication that the intervention was having an impact on the problem was that the scores steadily declined, and the last score measured as 31, much lower than the initial 36.
Also, there was no overlap in the scores, which is indicative of efficacy of the intervention since at least the participant’s score did not increase during the intervention phase. Although the participant’s score never got below the clinical cutting score of 30, the weighted average trend was . 7. This shows a strong positive correlation between the intervention and outcome. Again, coupled with the fact that there was no overlap and that the scores were steadily moving in the expected direction are all indicators that the intervention did have an impact on the problem. Discussions factors came into play during this experiment.
Environmental factors such as midterms and family stress influenced the participant’s overall level of anxiety, regardless of the influence of the intervention. The participant completed the assigned intervention each day at approximately the same time, and for the same amount of time each session- adding to the likelihood of environmental factors influencing the outcome. Still, the overall effectiveness of meditative breathing for treatment of the participant’s anxiety was demonstrated through the steady decline artisan’s willingness to continue with the intervention.