Free Sample: Does internet always improve quality of lives? paper example for writing essay

Does internet always improve quality of lives? - Essay Example

According to Danna Boyd (2014), first main argument is to argue about the freedom of the children. Helicopter parent limit them to hang out with friends, unable to get on their bicycles and locked them indoors. This make them to turned in social media and their smoothness to gossip and flirt with their peers. The second argument is let their children to face their mistake by not helping them. Helicopter parent undermining their confidence and make them lack of problem solving skills, have poor self advocacy skills.

Cause them to miss knowledge to succeed (Evanston, 2014). (94 words) 3. Boyd (2014) use personage anecdote to support her evidence in the article. She was clearly proved that she disagree on helicopter parenting. In her story, she was trying to show that teenagers need to make mistakes, face it and solve it themselves. She was glad that she did not get in such padded room to protect her. (60 words) 4. First significant danger is accessibility. Accessibility is a kind of bullying or harassment using technology. It is common nowadays and effect people in different ways.

It really suck because it can be public, hard to take down or effect it at home (“Accessibility” ,2014). Secondly, pornography is one of the most danger of the internet. Pornography hurts children, adult, couples, families, and society. Pornography interrupts the growth of a healthy sexual porn among teenaged too. It also distorts sexual attitudes and social realities among adults (Nielsen, 2014). Lastly, with the damaged reputation, kids can be the victims of their own inexperience with new technology likes digital cameras (Cam, 2007). Think before you post, because once u do, it is going to be up there forever” Sheehan says. (119 words) 5. Parents should monitor their children’s activities in internet. Parents play an important role in the children’s life. Parents should let the children know about the risks and danger about the internet to protect them. Monitor them wisely and get positive pay back. If parents give too much freedom on them, they have the curiosity to explore different web that may harm on them. Over 45 million children ages 10 through 17 using the internet.

One fifth has been sexually solicited. One fourth has encountered unwanted pornography. Three fifth has received an instant message and half of them have communicated back. Therefore, proper guidance must be taken by parents to help their children (“Protecting children online”, 2010). (112 6. I think Body’s (2014) suggestion is practical and realistic today. Giving them redeem, let them make their own mistakes, give some sensible advice when they ask, but let them grow up and take responsibility on them (Anderson, 2013).

Besides that, communicate positively is important and being a proper guidance for parents and children. By communicate to each others, children will get a better way to release their stress or tension easily. (69 words) 7. I think Danna Body’s argument is not convincing and persuasive. First, Danna Boyd did not give us enough evidence that what she saying is really relevant. No survey is done, no critical evidence to prove that she is right that many children who do not eave freedom (Boyd, 2014). First feature is she picks Jane Jacobs as her expert opinion.

Research show Jacobs is only an urbanism and activist and does not have an expert opinion in giving freedom, knowledge and experience in the area of child raising. Another feature is that making digital street safe because teen will be safe if there is adult and teen work together, communicate, negotiate. There is no critical evidence to support this. ( 118 words) 8. Firstly, I had learnt how to identify or recognize expert opinion and so must look at the person’s reputation, experience and knowledge.