Free Sample: The Administration of Horemheb paper example for writing essay

The Administration of Horemheb - Essay Example

Horsemen was a significant military leader that provided him with the opportunity to take the throne. He re-established the Annum religion In response to the failure of the Marin revolution. He carried out the construction of new temples, and tombs while deconstructing other pharaohs buildings, yet he also restored pharaohs tombs that had been robbed. With the downfall of the Marin revolution Horsemen rebuilt the society through a strong military base, and well-established administration system.

Surely, however, he often took credit and transformed various pharaohs’ edicts, and alluding claiming them as his own works, to what extent he established a constructive reformation during his reign is debated. Overall with frequent scrutiny of the Intentions and motives behind Horseshoe’s restoration of Egypt-referring a wide range of both second and primary sources to assess the reforms of Horseshoe’s reign.

Horsemen rose to power during the reign of the Marin predecessors, yet he blamed the deplorable state of Egypt on them, concomitantly attempting to remove all indication of their reigns-destroying everything related to the Eaten heresy; “HIS majesty took counsel with his heart… Expel evil and suppress lying”. The punishments that Horsemen demonstrated was not unusual for a pharaoh, he begun destroying Tutankhamen and Says names replacing them with the title of his own name. Then he began the dismantlement and destruction of both temples and building sites that were built dedicated to the worship of Eaten-including the city of Kathleen.

Temples at Kara, Heliports and Memphis were all deconstructed. Redford outlines the careful plan that Horseshoe’s crews were to abide by. Whether or not Horsemen was the pharaoh that ordered the desecration of the tombs, alluding and monuments for those pharaohs who were associated to the Marin revolution cannot be definitely proven: conversely we are aware that OAF sarcophagus was destroyed concomitantly his name was obliterated. Akin which was the birthplace of Assays a major focus of persecutions.

Lastly, nobles that had continued to follow Canteen’s successors also had their tombs desecrated. Horseshoe’s efforts to restore the restore the support of the Annum-priesthood was so effective that in the kings list of the Remedies period Horsemen was recorded as the successor of Amendment Ill. Overall Horseshoe’s attempt to erase the Marin period, In the counter-revolution can be seen as both a success in the reforms of his reign, and a failure In modern society due to the deconstruction of major historical buildings as well as events and personalities.

Nicholas Reeves criticizes his attempts to disregard the previous pharaohs achievements, claiming them as his own-while Redford argues that he had no better option for the situation he was in. Horseshoe’s building program counts as a successful and failure of his reforms during his reign. Horsemen claims he restored and emphasizes many of the rotational temples throughout his reign, which added to the wealth and religious significance through Egypt.

Horsemen restored royal tombs that had previously been robbed, such as Outmost Avis tomb, he also restored temples throughout Egypt as the Coronation Stele emphasizes the renovation of many temples and especially the 1 OFF temples and monuments that Horsemen dismantled in order to erase the Marin period, and to construct elaborate buildings himself. For instance through the construction of the ninth and tenth pylons at Kara, Horsemen dismantled the Eaten Temples using the materials to construct the pylons.

There was even archaeological evidence that these walls were set on fire, concluding that Horsemen was deceitful through his building program in respecting the honor of the past pharaohs. Horsemen removed many of Tutankhamen and Aye’s carthorses in order to erase them from their time period; this is evident throughout Tutankhamen mansion at Thebes. Horsemen usurped many of Tutankhamen statues, his hall at Luxury, as well as his Restoration Stele. Before Horseshoe’s tenth year in his reign he had successfully demolished the Eaten temples, as well as the most of the city of Kathleen, which was then later finalized by Renames II.

Horseshoe’s intentions were truly for the advance into the old Annum religion, disregarding the Marin revolution is debated by Nicholas Reeves. Yet furthermore Horsemen destroyed the remains of religious temples, which during the time period may have been adequate due to the reestablishment of the Annum religion. “Horsemen clearly saw much room for the reform of corrupt officials yet the lack of evidence of previous punishments makes it difficult to decide whether or not his punishments were harsher than normal. ” (Studies in Ancient Egypt.

Lawless. 2010) Therefore Horsemen did construct alluding adding to the wealth and image of Egypt yet these accomplishments are shadowed by his destruction of other buildings, limiting the success of his reforms during his reign. Horsemen attempted to re-establish the prominence of Amen during the counter-revolution, shifting away from the god Eaten and back to the traditional gods. In order to erase the Marin revolution Horsemen emphasized that Eaten was “only the symbolic physical body of the sun-god and not a separate god” (Smith, W. This is evident when Horsemen writes “the king of Gods (Amen) is the true god… He is Re, his body is the sun-disk. Horsemen thoroughly attempted to erase the existence of the Marin period pharaohs; he began the process of restoration for the Annum religion. Due to Horseshoe’s restoration the “Annum-Re chief god theology was able to reach unprecedented monotheistic heights and largely took into account the concepts which had led to primitive monotheism. ” (Majority, 2003, p. 55) After Horseshoe’s transformation of religion it strongly continued along the same path, gradually downgrading the role of the Eaten, “mixing chief god solar theology and monotheistic tendencies within a polytheistic system. ” (Majority, 2003, p. 55) Furthermore Horsemen succeeded in shifting away from the god Eaten after the failure of the Marin revolution, transforming Egypt with the new yet old religious traditions. Nevertheless Horsemen has made many reforms through the manipulation of previous pharaohs, limiting the success of reformations.

When Horsemen came to the throne, one of his main aims would to restore order and law, eradicate bureaucratic corruption and improve the lower classes welfare. Horsemen promised to return Egypt to an earlier standard of behavior, in order to do this he believed he had to address the corruption among the higher officials, particularly hose in Judiciary, the tax collectors exploitation of the lower classes, which operated with the knowledge of royal inspectors and lastly, the abuses by soldiers.

In order to and Lower Egypt seeking out men with good character that would be prepared to follow the laws. He laid down strict guidelines known as “The edict of Horsemen” for the new Judiciary to follow. These laws were similar to the instructions to a vizier, which was recorded in the tomb of Rehires. In order to remove the temptations that local officials had to extract more taxes from the peasants, Horsemen revived the rehearsal of giving a monthly banquet to treasury officials. Lastly the punishments for dishonest soldiers and higher officials were mutilation or exile.

To ensure these measures were taking place, he made frequent tours noting whether his laws were being practiced to the standard he set. This practice of Horseshoe’s is evident when he stated; “his majesty spent the whole time seeking the welfare of Egypt and searching out instances of oppression in the land. ” Horseshoe’s edict reforms were debated to what extent they were successful, for instance Hall claims “Horseshoe’s edict restored the welfare of the Egyptian people. (Uric, Ana. 2001) while it is also evident that Horseshoe’s new administration was transformed from those of other pharaohs, such as Outmost Ill.

Hall debated “Horseshoe’s reign was wholly taken up by this uneventful reorganization. ” (Hall, 1913, p. 312) degrading his reformations during his reign, while in contrast to Hall, O. Cascade claims “My impression is that both Aye and Horsemen were practical men who did their best to right the things which had gone wrong under the Tennis. “(O. Cascade) On the Edict of Reform Stele in the Kara Annum Temple, he declared that he had “improved this entire land” by horology reforming the administration, and especially the Judiciary, and wiping out corruption and theft.

Horsemen said that he required to “[expo]el evil and suppress lying delivering the Egyptians from the oppressions which were among them seeking the welfare of Egypt … ” Overall Horsemen achieved reformation through law and administration in Egypt, yet to which extent he achieved this is debated. His successors have been due to the transformation of success by other pharaohs concomitantly limiting the success of his own reforms. Nevertheless Horsemen did restore the administration during the counter revolution, although his ideas were ramifications from other Pharaohs.

The most significant proclamation involving laws and administration comes from Horseshoe’s construction of “The Edict of Horsemen” that was originally inscribed at Kara on a vast stele, 3 by 5 meters-“Then he seized palette and roll he put it into writing according to all that his majesty, the king himself said “My majesty commands concerning all instances of oppression in the land”. The edict of Horsemen put forth “a series of decrees designed to curb abuses, which had purportedly been allowed to run rampant in times past.

Included among these edicts is a proposal to reform the manner in which the royal court was provisioned on its travels within Egypt. ” (Morris, 2005, p. 274) Although one might assume that the reforms Horsemen composed were in primarily in response to abuses prompted by the recent Marin Pharaohs, “the practice of supplying quays by displacing royal costs onto local mayors is twice explicitly stated to have been instituted in the reign of Outmost Ill” (Morris, 2005, p. 275) Overall the practices pronounced in Horseshoe’s edict seems essentially identical to Outmost Ills policy introduced in Syria-Palestine.

Therefore, Horseshoe’s litany with new ideological laws to act upon in maintaining a strong well-ordered society after the Marin revolution, yet Horsemen has realistically repeated the successors of past pharaohs, shifting and shaping them to take credit as his own. In conclusion Horsemen restored Egyptian society after the failure of the Marin revolution as he re-established the old Annum religion, disregarding the Eaten religion. Horseshoe’s building program mainly consisted of the admonishment of other pharaohs buildings and monuments in the construction of his own, while he claimed that he re-built many of these temples.

Horsemen then attempted to transform Egyptian society hoping to “expel evil and suppress lying”. Although Horsemen established the fundamentals to a great society, minimizing theft and dishonesty the laws that he set out seem identically to those of Outmost Ill and therefore had Just transformed old laws claiming them as his own. Furthermore, although the punishments that Horsemen practiced on the Marin Pharaohs would have been socially accepted for the time period, Horsemen made major changes to the counter revolution that shaped Egyptian society nonetheless these new laws weren’t carried out effectively.